Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T600 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA T600 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +367%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy