Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060 +76%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

188W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy