Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +21%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
576
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

188W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy