Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +2300%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
72
240
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

188W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy