Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (38W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +279%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

238W
TDP
38W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy