Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +60%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP107
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

238W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy