Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
12864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +4302%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
13312
56
TMUs
832
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy