NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A4000
+1764%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
48
448
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
140W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GA104-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
