CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+3853%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
VS
Quadro FX 360M
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G86
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Board Design
247W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
2
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
4
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
5
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
6
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
7
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy