Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075 +4369%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G98
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
12W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy