Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +73%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy