Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +1700%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy