Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2006
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
110 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy