Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +979%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy