Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +310%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy