Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +1565%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy