Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1339%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
512
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy