Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +29%
1.332 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
900W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy