NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+13453%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2496
Shading Units
16
208
TMUs
8
40
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
G86
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
