Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +94%
6.844 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c
55
Quadro M6000 24 GB +121%
122
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
3072
208
TMUs
256
40
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM200
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy