NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+20%
4.252 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c
55
Quadro M5000
+58%
87
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
2048
208
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GM204
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
