NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+258%
12.63 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c
55
Quadro P6000
+223%
178
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
2496
Shading Units
3840
208
TMUs
240
40
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
GP102
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
