Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c +2674%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2496
Shading Units
48
208
TMUs
24
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G94
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy