CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
VS
NVIDIA Tesla K20c
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (160W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
+102%
7.119 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
VS
Quadro RTX 4000
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
2496
Shading Units
2304
208
TMUs
144
40
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
TU104
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
2
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
3
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
4
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
5
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st
6
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
7
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
8
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
9
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
10
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla C870
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy