NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
+6%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c
55
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+29%
71
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2496
Shading Units
1024
208
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
TU117
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
