Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20m +4305%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2496
Shading Units
32
208
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy