Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +719%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy