Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +751%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2688
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy