Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Tesla K20X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20X +17008%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
8
224
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
12W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy