Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +120%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +156%
372
Quadro M2000
145
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm +125%
63
Quadro M2000
28
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2688
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy