Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +31%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +35%
372
Quadro M5000M
275
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm +3%
63
Quadro M5000M
61
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy