Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +32%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +61%
372
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm +16%
63
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
2688
Shading Units
1152
224
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy