Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1098MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40c +259%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK180
GPU Name
GM107
GK180-890-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy