Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40m +951%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

245W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy