Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40st vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Tesla K40st vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40st and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40st 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40st
3.312 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +317%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
7680
240
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

34.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
3.312 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy