CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1332%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
2
NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
3
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
6
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy