Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
13632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +4547%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
14080
56
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
600W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
153 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy