Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +111%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
448
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GF100
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy