Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100 +108%
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1344
56
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy