Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (154W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +346%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G80
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
154W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy