Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +178%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
128
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G80
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy