Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +65%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
448
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
189W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GT200B
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy