Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +130%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy