Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +19%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM107
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy