Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +3444%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G86
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy