Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile +11%
1.147 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1303 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
3
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
18W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP108
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy