Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +592%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
36
448
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU104
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy