NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+71%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
