Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +3705%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
34W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G96
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy