NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1007%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
